Switzerland is three-quarters of a democracy - SWI swissinfo.ch (2024)

Just three out of four people in Switzerland have a Swiss passport, meaning that a quarter of taxpaying residents have no political voice. There are several reasons for this democracy deficit.

Generally, Swiss residents must wait tenyears to apply for citizenship. By comparison, in Sweden, those from elsewhere in Scandinavia (Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway) can apply for Swedish citizenship after just two years. Other nationalities must wait five years.

Switzerland’s strict integration policy with its obstacles to citizenship has led to many foreigners opting out of seeking a Swiss passport. This also eliminates their right to political participation.

It is often this lack of integration of foreigners into the political process that stops Switzerland from taking the lead in international democracy rankings.

One country, 26 different policies

But each Swiss region is different when it comes to citizenship and political participation rights for foreigners. With its research project nccr on the moveExternal link, External linkNeuchâtel University has closely examined these differences, finding significant discrepancies between the rural cantons of the German-speaking and southern parts of Switzerland and the urban protestant cantons of northern and western Switzerland.

The picture is even clearer when comparing political participation of foreigners. The French-speaking cantons, especially Neuchâtel, are comparably liberal. Apart from Neuchâtel, only Basel City, Graubünden and Appenzell Outer Rhodes envisage involving foreigners in political decision making. No other cantons have acted on this front.

(Cantons can only influence participation on their level; voting on a national level requires a Swiss passport).

Belonging to the republic

Lucerne University has developed an indexExternal link to compare participation among European democracies, taking into account the inclusion of immigrants. Sweden is the European champion in including foreigners, while Switzerland ranks last, just behind Cyprus.

Switzerland’s notoriously strict integration policy is mainly due to its history as well as the conception of the state as a republic. Switzerland is probably among the most republican of all republics, and one characteristic of this form of government is clearly limiting the population.

In other words, it’s well defined who belongs to the republic and who doesn’t. Once he or she has become part of the republic, a sovereign citizen enjoys extensive political rights to decide as well as participate. The republican citizen is more than just a citizen – he or she is part of the state, which means ruling and being ruled at the same time. This exclusive and even hegemonic awareness of civil rights can help explain the comparatively late introduction of voting rights for women in Switzerland in 1971. Before giving women the vote, bourgeois men found that their female counterparts should not “belong to the republic”.

Yes to taxes, no to voting

The flipside to the coin is that those who don’t belong to the republic have little to no say in politics, even though they pay taxes like their Swiss neighbours.

When it comes to regulating public affairs, outsiders’ opinions don’t count. That leads to a democratic deficit. One of the principles of a liberal state says that those who pay taxes and obey national laws have the right to participate in political life.

If women’s voting rights are an indicator of how quickly liberalisation happens in Switzerland, then flying cars, summer holidays on Mars and in-vitro schnitzels will probably come about before national voting rights for foreigners.

Giving foreigners the right to vote at a national level would require uncoupling citizens’ rights from political rights. Switzerland is more likely to make obtaining a passport less restrictive, though such a proposal would almost certainly meet vehement opposition.

The first and last person trying to squeeze Switzerland into a liberal corset was no other than Napoleon Bonaparte. But even Europe’s greatest ruler was forced to capitulate. In his desperation, he is said to have uttered, “Fortunate circ*mstances got me to the top of the French government, but I would deem myself unfit to rule Switzerland.”

Translated from German by Billi Bierling, adapted by Veronica DeVore

Read more

More

Left behind and locked out of Swiss democracy

This content was published on Feb 8, 2019 Democracy is based on the promise to adequately and appropriately represent the population. However, Switzerland’s system reveals some shortcomings.

Read more: Left behind and locked out of Swiss democracy

More

The four ingredients of a successful people’s initiative

This content was published on Oct 12, 2018 The people’s initiative is the fundamental instrument of Swiss direct democracy, but what's needed to make it successful?

Read more: The four ingredients of a successful people’s initiative

More

The different faces of direct democracy

This content was published on Mar 24, 2018 Direct democracy is under pressure notably in Eastern Europe, a recent international conference has heard.

Read more: The different faces of direct democracy

More

Does a minority rule Switzerland?

This content was published on Jan 15, 2018 A democracy with flaws: turnout in votes and elections in Switzerland is notoriously low compared to other countries.

Read more: Does a minority rule Switzerland?

More

Foreigner voting rights: broad variety of opinions

This content was published on Jan 10, 2019 What do swissinfo.ch readers make of the idea of granting foreigners in Switzerland the right to take part in votes and elections?

Read more: Foreigner voting rights: broad variety of opinions

More

Zurich wants to ease political participation for non-Swiss

This content was published on Jan 4, 2019 Switzerland’s biggest city attracts many expatriates. But it does not grant them any say in political matters in a country proud of its democracy.

Read more: Zurich wants to ease political participation for non-Swiss